Ionic Air Purifiers – Safety First ReduxIonic Air Purifiers – Safety First Redux

Ionic air purifiers derive from a multitude of technologies, all of which contain one or far more useful reactive agents that claim to clean the air that we breathe. Manufacturers willingly publish test results to demonstrate the potency of these reactive agents against dangerous contaminants.

Security Very first – Advantageous Reactive Agents

However, companies are not as forthcoming with facts on the possible harm to human tissue of customers who are exposed to the reactive agents. The in-depth short article dealing with this aspect is posted at

Safety Initial Redux – Unintended By-goods

Producers are also not forthcoming about the by-merchandise of their technologies. Unbeknownst to numerous users, all ionic air purifier technologies generate by-solutions apart from the helpful reactive agents. They are not deliberately made but are merely unintended goods resulting from existing technological constraints.

Ozone, a component pollutant of smog, is the most prevalent of these by-merchandise. Smog, which hangs like a foggy cloud more than some cities, is typically produced by the reaction of sunlight on automotive emissions such as carbon monoxide. Ozone in smog is blamed for quite a few ills.

Please note that this article is not a discussion about ozone generators, a class of air purifiers that deliberately produces ozone in high enough concentrations to eradicate airborne contaminants. For instance, some hotels use ozone generators to get rid of tobacco smoke from rooms when they are being prepared for the next guest.

It is normally accepted that ozone generators pose a danger to human tissue simply because ozone is an really reactive oxidizing agent. Even so, for some strange explanation, ozone generators are still freely sold to dwelling users as air purifiers. This controversy possibly warrants a different round of in-depth investigation in future.

All Ionic Air Purifiers Make Some Ozone As A By-item

The concentrate of this post is on ionic air purifiers that do not deliberately make ozone. There is no dispute that all ionic air purifier technologies are presently unable to totally get rid of ozone in the course of action of generating their valuable reactive agents, be they negative ions, bipolar ions or plasmacluster ions and so on. It is a question of how significantly ozone is made as an unintended by-product and at which point it becomes unhealthy and damaging to customers of the ionic air purifier.

Most makers emphasize that the ozone developed by their technologies is extremely minimal. Usually, they claim that it is way beneath 50 parts per billion (ppb), a measure of ozone concentration generally cited by various parties about the globe. Interestingly, there is no established legislation, only guidelines, regulating that ionic air purifiers cannot generate ozone in excess of 50 ppb. This leads us to the subsequent query.

Is Ozone Concentration At 50 ppb Safe?

This is the million dollar question in the multimillion dollar ionic air purifier business.

It is an even far more essential query for users (who commonly have respiratory challenges) of such purifiers due to the fact they could be harming themselves immediately after spending excellent dollars on what they think to be helpful to their well being. It should also be of good concern to well being authorities considering the fact that they are entrusted with setting security requirements that govern manufacturers and that customers rely on when they use such gear.

1 would assume that the 50 ppb limit was scientifically set by some authorities, either healthcare or governmental. Shockingly, this does not appear to be the case. In reality, a prominent environmentalist suggested that this limit was arbitrarily set in the US FDA Amendment Act 1972 with no any scientific basis. Yet, the 50 ppb figure is frequently cited, not just by companies of ionic air purifiers but by well being authorities all more than the planet as nicely.

To add to 空氣淨化機 , the 50 ppb limit beneath the US FDA Act only applies to an air purifier that is sold as a health-related device! Now, that is simple to get about. It is not typical to see air purifiers getting advertized as health-related gear. They are ordinarily sold as appliances for enhancing air good quality in the home, workplace, factory or college. But to their credit, manufacturers of a lot of ionic air purifiers are voluntarily applying 50 ppb as a security limit.

There is also some measure of manage imposed by the US Consumer Security Solutions Act which covers ionic air purifiers that are not sold as healthcare devices. In a 2006 study, a US Customer Item Safety Commission discovered that the 50 ppb ozone limit seems to be safe. But the Commission did highlight that ozone also enters into human dwellings from outdoor air, the so-known as ambient air. This may perhaps elevate the actual ozone concentration above 50 ppb when an air purifier is becoming operated. Strangely once more, there is no legislation in the US Customer Safety Goods Act about the 50 ppb ozone limit.

California Requires The Lead – Suppliers Of Ionic Air Purifiers Take Note!

In October 2008, the US state of California took the very first methods to regulate compliance with the 50 ppb ozone limit. It is aimed mostly at ozone generators but the regulation also covers ionic air purifiers. Severe players in the market ought to be factoring this pretty significant development in their methods if they do not want to see their Californian market share “terminated” (pun intended).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *